Jun 18, 2019
Adam Black speaks to the Law Times about a recent case that reiterates the importance of confidentiality
A recent case confirms the importance of confidentiality in settlements, including those achieved in mediation, whether or not the mediation contract contains a confidentiality clause.
In Benson v. Kitt, the judge found that confidentiality was covered by the common law principle of settlement privilege.
Adam Black, a partner in our Family Law Group said that believes Justice Monahan’s decision supports the objective of mediation as an alternative dispute resolution process that can result in a settlement satisfactory to both parties.
A settlement in mediation can meet the objective of addressing everyone’s interest, he says.
“The process of mediation requires full and candid discussions between the parties without fear of those discussions finding their way outside out of the four corners of mediation,” he says. “And without the protection, the settlement privilege, that attaches to mediation, the fear is that these candid discussions won't happen. And I think those candid discussions are a necessarily ingredient to a successful mediation.”
This article appeared in the Law Times. To read the complete article, visit the Law Times online.
As part of our commitment to diversity and inclusion, we are honoured to continue our support of women in law through the annual Torkin Manes/ Women's...
Mar 8, 2021
As part of our commitment to diversity and inclusion, and to create opportunities for Black students to pursue law as a career.
Feb 17, 2021
In the News
The National Family Law Arbitration Course, which will run over six days in February and March, will introduce participants to the skills, processes a...
Jan 29, 2021