Mar 6, 2020
Laurie Pawlitza speaks to Law Times about the Health Care Consent Act
A recent case highlights how the Health Care Consent Act, which calls for judges to take a child’s wishes into account when it comes to consenting to treatment, is not the ultimate consideration in family law cases where the court is considering reunification therapy in child alienation cases.
In A.M. v. C.H., which dealt with a 14-year-old child who had been estranged from his father by his mother, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that overlaid on the HCCA is the Divorce Act and the Children’s Law Reform Act in Ontario, “which say the best interest of the child are the ultimate test for the court,” says Laurie Pawlitza, a partner in the family law group at Torkin Manes LLP.
“In particular, it’s spelled out in the Children’s Law Reform Act that, while a court is required to consider when determining best interest the views and preferences of the child, the court still has the overriding jurisdiction under the family law legislation to make a determination as to best interest. Basically, they said the best interest test gives the court the jurisdiction to make a decision even though it’s possible the HCCA would mean you need the kid’s consent.”
To read the full Law Times article, please click here.
Osgoode Certificate in Family Law Skills and Practice
On March 5th, Adam Black of our Family Law Group will be chairing a full-day course about dispute resolution options available when your family law ma...
Feb 28, 2020
In the News
The Ontario Court of Appeal has enunciated the principles governing the appointment of amicus curiae (friend of the court) in private family law cases...
Jan 22, 2020
Congratulations to Adam Black, a partner in our Family Law Group, for his recognition from Lexology as a Legal Influencer for the Future of Legal Serv...
Jan 21, 2020