Mar 6, 2020
Laurie Pawlitza speaks to Law Times about the Health Care Consent Act
A recent case highlights how the Health Care Consent Act, which calls for judges to take a child’s wishes into account when it comes to consenting to treatment, is not the ultimate consideration in family law cases where the court is considering reunification therapy in child alienation cases.
In A.M. v. C.H., which dealt with a 14-year-old child who had been estranged from his father by his mother, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that overlaid on the HCCA is the Divorce Act and the Children’s Law Reform Act in Ontario, “which say the best interest of the child are the ultimate test for the court,” says Laurie Pawlitza, a partner in the family law group at Torkin Manes LLP.
“In particular, it’s spelled out in the Children’s Law Reform Act that, while a court is required to consider when determining best interest the views and preferences of the child, the court still has the overriding jurisdiction under the family law legislation to make a determination as to best interest. Basically, they said the best interest test gives the court the jurisdiction to make a decision even though it’s possible the HCCA would mean you need the kid’s consent.”
To read the full Law Times article, please click here.
Torkin Manes is pleased to announce that several firm members have been named as leaders in their fields in The 2020 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory....
May 12, 2020
In the News
Laurie Pawlitza speaks to Canadian Lawyer on cannabis drug use being hard to prove in family law.
Apr 24, 2020
Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Adam Black of our Family Law Group speaks to Leslie Roberts of CFRA (Ottawa) to discuss the case of an Ontario man being barred from his home after fa...
Apr 15, 2020