Mar 6, 2020
Laurie Pawlitza speaks to Law Times about the Health Care Consent Act
A recent case highlights how the Health Care Consent Act, which calls for judges to take a child’s wishes into account when it comes to consenting to treatment, is not the ultimate consideration in family law cases where the court is considering reunification therapy in child alienation cases.
In A.M. v. C.H., which dealt with a 14-year-old child who had been estranged from his father by his mother, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that overlaid on the HCCA is the Divorce Act and the Children’s Law Reform Act in Ontario, “which say the best interest of the child are the ultimate test for the court,” says Laurie Pawlitza, a partner in the family law group at Torkin Manes LLP.
“In particular, it’s spelled out in the Children’s Law Reform Act that, while a court is required to consider when determining best interest the views and preferences of the child, the court still has the overriding jurisdiction under the family law legislation to make a determination as to best interest. Basically, they said the best interest test gives the court the jurisdiction to make a decision even though it’s possible the HCCA would mean you need the kid’s consent.”
To read the full Law Times article, please click here.
Torkin Manes is pleased to announce that our firm has once again been recognized as the #1 Top Regional Law Firm in Ontario by Canadian Lawyer magazin...
May 17, 2023
Torkin Manes is proud to congratulate our esteemed lawyers who have been included in the 2023 Edition of the Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory. The Fir...
Mar 3, 2023
In the News
Laurie H. Pawlitza
Laurie Pawlitza's article titled, "Evolution of the family — The importance of biological ties," was featured in the January issue of the Ontario Fami...
Jan 11, 2023