News
In the News
Sep 8, 2021

Peter Straszynski quoted by the Human Resources Director on vaccine passports

Share:
Human Resources Director View original

Peter Straszynski was quoted by the Human Resources Director on whether an employee can refuse to register for a vaccine passport. 


With Premier Ford’s announcement that Ontario would be rolling out vaccine passports for recreational activities, HR leaders have once again been left scratching their heads. The mandate requires any entrant into bars, restaurants, event spaces, and gyms (to name a few) to show a certificate at the door. But what of the employees working within these organizations? Can an employer legally insist on a certificate from staff? And, if so, what happens if a worker refuses?

“So far, the Ontario Government’s announcements of a vaccine passport requirement apply to persons who want to visit or enter certain types of public establishments or settings, but not to the employees of those workplaces,” Peter Straszynski, partner at Torkin Manes LLP, told HRD.

“An employer may require a vaccine passport of its employees, the same way an employer can require mandatory vaccination in the workplace. There’s really not any material difference between the two. Having said that, employers should consider whether such a requirement is appropriate for their workplace and, importantly, must remember that there are exceptions where employees may have legitimate medical or other ground to refuse to vaccinate - and consequently to register for a passport.”

Emerging legal grounds

This is all very new ground for both employers and employees – however, as Straszynski advised, that’s not an excuse to make generalisations or assumptions. Importantly, while employees might well have a right to decline the vaccine and the passport, HR needs to look into whether or not the reason given is protected by law. This may include religious beliefs, medical grounds, or disabilities.

“Objections based on grounds protected by human rights legislation may require accommodation by the employer to the point of ‘undue hardship’,” added Straszynski. “Where an employee’s objection is based on a reason that does not reflect a legally protected ground, employers may choose to terminate employment for non-compliance, but they should reasonably expect that such a termination will be ‘without cause’ and will require payment of appropriate termination pay in the circumstances.”

Fired for refusing?

The law around terminating an employee’s contract over a refusal to be vaccinated, and as such register for a COVID certificate, is highly contentious. Even if an employer does decide to terminate an employee – it’s not a cut and dry situation. Speaking to Straszynski, he doesn’t believe that such a termination could be upheld for ‘just cause’ – unless however, that vaccination is mandated by law.

“We’ll have to see as these types of terminations happen, and get litigated,” he told HRD. “There are no crystal balls or super clear answers to these questions right now.”


To read the full article, please visit the HRD website.

Related News

Firm News

Torkin Manes lawyers featured in The Best Lawyers in Canada 2022 and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch (Canada)

We are pleased to announce that 34 of our partners have recently been recognized as leaders in their respective fields in the latest edition of The Be...
Aug 26, 2021
In the News

Peter Straszynski quoted by CBC News on mandatory vaccination policies

Peter C. Straszynski Peter Straszynski was quoted by CBC News on several big companies who are exploring mandatory vaccination policies for Canadian staff.
Aug 16, 2021
Firm News

Torkin Manes shortlisted by Chambers Canada for the 2021 Regional Law Firm of the Year Award

Torkin Manes is once again honoured to be shortlisted by Chambers & Partners in the category of Regional Law Firm of the Year for the 2021 Chambers Ca...
Jul 13, 2021